Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Blog Article
Need to understand the price of the espresso beater in Pakistan? In this article’s the info: coffee beater price in pakistan.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, it is also a very well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been of your view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion may very well be thought of, however, we've been crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy matter on the approval in the competent authority.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are on the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are issue to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post get more info allow the case in the petitioners for promotion may very well be considered, however, we're apparent inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, matter to availability of vacancy subject matter into the approval from the competent authority.
Section 302 of the PPC deals with one of several most significant offenses in criminal law: murder. In this web site post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, investigate the punishment it involves, and examine some notable case laws related to this particular section.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation features the names of the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it had been decided, as well as the book in which it's recorded. Different citation requirements may perhaps incorporate italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
acquitted the appellants from the many charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, may be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It will involve the execution of the convicted person for a consequence of their crime.
Regardless of its popularity, very few may pay attention to its intricacies. This article is undoubtedly an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section plus the particularly small threshold that governs it.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively recognized now that the provision for proforma promotion will not be alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it is actually lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority could if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and identified researchers to review and rule on long term grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.